BoE and ECB Review: Opportunities to Fade Moves

Summary

• As expected, the Bank of England (BoE) came out dovish, and the European Central Bank (ECB) came out strongly hawkish.
• BoE messaging and forecasts suggest that a pause in hiking is the most likely outcome from here.
• The tone at the ECB was that 50bp in March is almost certain, and hiking thereafter is likely.

Market Implications

• There is further value in positioning for a lower BoE terminal rate (4.0%) and being short GBP – we favour against AUD and EUR.
• Initial market reaction to the ECB was puzzling. Expect (as in October) the initial dovish positioning will fade.

BoE – Dovish as Expected, a Likely Pause Here

The Bank of England (BoE) hiked the bank rate by 50bp to 4.0% as expected. Seven MPC members backed the move, and two (external members Tenreyro and Dhingra) voted for no hike. The policy statement strongly supported my belief that they are now done with hikes (dropping reference to ‘forceful monetary policy response’). Additional hikes are conditional on inflation worsening versus their November forecasts.

The updated monetary policy report (MPR), based on the current bank rate, provided a relatively uncontroversial base case, including:

• A shallower recession than at the November MPR.
• An increased (albeit still gently sloped) upward profile for unemployment (Chart 1).
• Sharper near-term disinflation and an earlier undershoot versus the target (albeit with strong upside risks stressed to the medium-term; Chart 2).

Hawkish caveats to the statement were wrapped into the comments around the overshoots in domestic drivers of inflation: i.e., wage growth and services inflation. These are related, with wages encompassing a significant proportion of services business costs and so being the more important of the two. As such, the conditionality on further hikes will largely be pointed at labour market outturns.

This may sound like a relatively modest requirement (data to disappoint). But it is relative to the MPC’s base assumptions on the labour market, which I find to be overly optimistic (i.e., their forecast for unemployment rises too slowly). Given much of the labour market tightness has been driven by the participation rate, I expect once the labour market starts to turn, it will be faster than the BoE expects. History supports this (Chart 3).

For wage growth, timely HMRC data suggests the momentum will continue to build (Chart 4). While this may, at first, point towards likely positive surprises ahead, and so more tightening, this may not be the case. The BoE notes signs of labour market loosening and wage growth easing, with the rate of growth stabilising on a three-month basis and survey data suggesting further moderation ahead. But, more importantly, they explicitly state that their base case assumption (i.e., what will need to be beaten to justify more hikes) is ‘broadly consistent with the results of the latest Agents’ pay survey… just under 6%’.

In other words, the recent record trajectory of pay growth need only change a little to remain within the BoE base-case (Chart 5). The data release on 14 February (December pay & unemployment, January claimant count) will be particularly important.

A hike in March is now conditional on services inflation and/or wage growth overshooting versus BoE projections. Given that BoE projections remain relatively optimistic on labour market, this is a tail risk in my view. Given the willingness to pause, if hikes were needed, such hikes would probably be at the lower rate of 25bp. Consequently, market pricing for 18bp in March and 33bp until terminal rate looks overly hawkish.

I see further value in positioning for a lower BoE terminal rate (4.0%), and further GBP weakness (particularly in EUR/GBP).

ECB: Hawkish as Expected – Fade Market Reaction

As I had expected, the ECB hiked by 50bp and struck a strongly hawkish tone, emphasising the probability of a 50bp March hike and the likelihood of more hikes thereafter.

President Lagarde may have conceded that inflation and economic activity had slowed (albeit the latter slowed less than ECB forecasts), but she took care to repeat the arguments for further hiking: strong core inflation, the generosity and breadth of current fiscal plans, and the rising trajectory for wages. ECB implied assumptions that fiscal policy will be pared back soon seem optimistic.

Lagarde’s messaging on the policy path could hardly have been clearer: they need to raise significantly into restrictive levels, 50bp in March is their ‘strong intent’, and they ‘won’t be there [done with hiking] in March’.

In this context, it is difficult to comprehend the strong rates bid that has been seen across Europe in the aftermath of the announcement. The market came to the table on the back of an unremarkable FOMC, ignoring Chair Powell’s assertion that more hikes were needed. Perhaps, in that context, the market was expecting Lagarde’s tone to leave no room for uncertainty. Even so, the EGB and gilts bid that followed on from the press conference has gone far beyond that seen in the US (Chart 6).

Meanwhile, the decline in 2Y EUR swaps (-16bps) was the largest single day decline since the 27 October 2022 ECB meeting (Chart 7). I saw little justification in the dovish move, and 2Y swaps rose 40bp over the following week. Bloomberg may have played a role, stressing Lagarde’s admission that ‘intent’ for a March 50bp hike was not a 100% done deal. I think this is a weak argument given the context – recall that Lagarde has previously been burned by bad forward guidance.

In conclusion, the ECB decision and press conference add further weight to my expectation that the ECB will end up hiking to at least 3.5% and has done nothing to change my expectation for periphery EGB weakness.

Henry Occleston is a Strategist, who focuses on European markets. Formerly, he worked in European credit and rates strategy at Mizuho Bank, and market strategy at Lloyds Bank.

(The commentary contained in the above article does not constitute an offer or a solicitation, or a recommendation to implement or liquidate an investment or to carry out any other transaction. It should not be used as a basis for any investment decision or other decision. Any investment decision should be based on appropriate professional advice specific to your needs.)