
Economics & Growth | Global | Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Economics & Growth | Global | Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Explaining market moves is hard enough, let alone forecasting them. And there are three market dynamics on my mind:
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
Explaining market moves is hard enough, let alone forecasting them. And there are three market dynamics on my mind:
As soon as Silicon Valley Bank failed, rates markets priced dramatic Fed easings. Markets went from pricing a peak Fed policy rate of 5.5% and barely any cuts for 2023 to pricing a peak of 5.25%, at least 50bps of cuts in 2023 and another 150bps for 2024. The sharp inversion of the US 3m2y curve reflects this (Chart 1). It suggests rates markets are pricing a recession. Yet the S&P500 has surged over the past month (Chart 1). What gives?
One answer is that US big tech companies are less sensitive to recessionary dynamics and benefit more from lower rates. Indeed, they have already been shedding labour and so are in recession mode. US tech also benefits from non-US growth. Focusing on small caps, which likely reflect expectations of the US real economy, we find that they have indeed underperformed since the Fed repricing (Chart 2).
If we look at US rates markets in more detail, we find a clear narrative. The SVB failure introduced a new shock to the US system. There has been a flight to high-quality collateral with short-term US T-bill yields collapsing (Chart 3). At the same time, the shock has sharply lowered 1y inflation expectations. This suggests rates markets are implying a credit crunch sufficient to bring a US recession, lower inflation and the start of a Fed easing cycle.
Taking this at face value, we have two further questions. Can US tech and the S&P500 still perform in a US recession? Can the rest of the world de-couple from a US recession?
The latest US CPI report showed a large drop in the headline rate of inflation from 6% in February to 5% in March. Declines in food and energy drove much of this, since core inflation remained sticky around 5.6% (in February, it was 5.5%). Reading inflation since COVID has been a challenge because the US economy has undergone a sectoral shock. Lockdowns led to a goods boom and services bust; the re-opening has seen the reverse.
The breakdown of CPI components shows that this continues to be the case. The inflation pulse for energy, food at home, used cars and medical services continue to show deflationary pulses (Chart 4). These were sectors that boomed during lockdown. On the other side, we continue to see inflationary dynamics in food away from home, shelter, transport and recreation.
This divergence is visible in the less discussed food component. The BLS bundles ‘food at home’ with ‘food away from home’ (restaurants). Yet different dynamics can drive these components. Notably, households that feel comfortable with their income are more likely to go to restaurants, which in turn leads to higher restaurant prices.
Looking at y/y changes in both components since 1970, ‘food at home’ exhibits high volatility while ‘food away from home’ is smoother (Chart 5). Notably, the ‘food away from home’ measure has yet to fall, suggesting inflationary pressures remain. The 3m pulse in these components confirms this – it shows ‘food away from home’ is stabilising around the 7% mark (Chart 6).
This week’s US small business (NFIB) survey brought much attention. Overall optimism was a low 90, which it has been since June 2022. The index has been falling since 2018.
Yet within the components are conflicting signals. Actual capex has risen since last year, despite small businesses thinking it is a bad time to expand. On the credit side, which covers the SVB failure period, the availability of loans fell, but more small businesses felt their borrowing needs were being met. This shows the challenge of using the NFIB survey: you can pick a bullish or bearish take depending on your bias.
My preference is to focus on the survey question, ‘What is the single most important problem you face?’ On that front, by far the biggest problems are either the labour market (costs or quality of workers) or inflation (Chart 7).
Financial issues barely register. Even during the GFC, the bigger challenge was poor sales rather than financial issues. We have to go back to the early 1980s to see a time when financial issues were the biggest problem.
To me, this suggests that small businesses are not feeling a credit crunch or collapsing demand. Of course, it may take a few months for these issues to come to the surface, but the message from the latest survey is that we are not there yet.
For now, we are running with a bullish risk theme, especially in EM. We are short USD against EM, and long EM equities. In DM, we are long US real rates and short Italy. Here are the details:
Spring sale - Prime Membership only £3 for 3 months! Get trade ideas and macro insights now
Your subscription has been successfully canceled.
Discount Applied - Your subscription has now updated with Coupon and from next payment Discount will be applied.