data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cedbe/cedbe74baaa35c28d1a637fd2e39afe566ffb042" alt="featured"
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
March nonfarm payrolls (NFP) at 236,000 aligned with expectations of 230,000. Employment growth continued to slow YoY, but remains twice as fast as before the pandemic and 1.5 times faster than labour supply (Chart 1). Unemployment fell by 10bp to 3.5%.
As I expected, the participation rate increased by 10bp, which could be related to the trough in the household savings rate. The recovery in savings, in turn, could reflect that for a growing number of Americans, the pandemic transfers have been spent. Consequently, they are returning work (Chart 2). If so, the recovery in participation has further to go.
In theory, an increase in participation is disinflationary since it increases the supply of labour and therefore moderates wage growth. In practice, the change is likely too gradual to have a discernible impact on wages.
Average hourly earnings growth accelerated by 10bp to 0.3% MoM, which seems inconsistent with the tightness of the labour market.
This partly reflects compositional effects. For instance, overtime hours as a share of total hours remained low (Chart 3). Furthermore, growth in low-paid employment remains faster than growth in higher-paid work (Chart 4).
But the key factor driving the nominal wage growth slowdown is disinflation. In real terms, real median wage growth has been accelerating since early-2022 (Chart 5).
As a result of the recovery in real wage growth, the income share of labour has been rising while that of profits has been falling (Chart 6). This creates a risk that inflation could accelerate again as businesses defend their profit margins. The risk is significant as the US economy is highly concentrated and resource pressures remain pervasive, as shown for instance by an unemployment rate at a 50-year low.
Following the NFP release, the market priced a 70% risk of hike at the 3 May FOMC meeting, from previously about 30%.
This seems about right. Yesterday’s Nick Timiraos WSJ article on how the 25bp March FFR hike was decided gives us clues for the May meeting. The article stated that:
The backdrop to next month’s FOMC meeting is likely to be continued banking stability. Yesterday’s Fed balance sheet showed further stabilization as lending to banks continued to decrease. At the same time, money market fund (MMF) assets increased but less so than the previous week. Since MMF assets are tightly correlated with deposits, this is another sign of bank stability. Also, deposit flights reflect largely quantitative tightening rather than a loss of confidence in banks.
Against a backdrop of continued banking sector stability, the Fed is likely to focus on inflation risks; today’s data show these remain substantial. If the CPI comes out, per consensus, at 40bp MoM for core and banking stability continues, there is a good chance of a 25bp hike next month.
Spring sale - Prime Membership only £3 for 3 months! Get trade ideas and macro insights now
Your subscription has been successfully canceled.
Discount Applied - Your subscription has now updated with Coupon and from next payment Discount will be applied.