Inflation In The 21st Century Is A Supply-Side Phenomenon
(3 min read)
‘It is habitually assumed that whenever there is a greater amount of money in the country, or in existence, a rise of prices must necessarily follow. But this is by no means an inevitable consequence. In no commodity is it the quantity in existence, but the quantity offered for sale, that determines the value. Whatever may be the quantity of money in the country, only that part of it will affect prices, which goes into the market commodities, and is there actually exchanged against goods. Whatever increases the amount of this portion of the money in the country, tends to raise prices. But money hoarded does not act on prices. Money kept in reserve by individuals to meet contingencies which do not occur, does not act on prices. The money in the coffers of the Bank, or retained as a reserve by private bankers, does not act on prices until drawn out, nor even then unless drawn out to be expended in commodities.’
John Stuart Mill, Principles of Political Economy, Book III, Chapter VIII, par.17, p.20.
In his latest Global Strategy Weekly, Albert Edwards explains why he thinks the surge in the money supply is deflationary. As usual, he counters the consensus here, even though he gives credit to people like Russell Napier who correctly identifies the changing nature of US money supply but concludes that this is highly inflationary. I think Edwards is right for the wrong reasons, and Napier wrong for the right ones.
TO READ THIS HIVE EXCLUSIVE SUBSCRIBE TO MACRO HIVE PRIME