
Monetary Policy & Inflation | Rates | UK
Monetary Policy & Inflation | Rates | UK
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
The BoE will need to walk a careful line on messaging at Thursday’s meeting. There is majority agreement on the need for further tightening within the MPC, and the strong likelihood is for a 25bp rise, but the probability of dissenting votes is high, and the messaging will need to be strongly nuanced.
There has been a recent spate of hawkish central bank surprises (RBA, and Riksbank for instance), which have come amidst an increased appetite for larger increment hikes. BoE hawk Catherine Mann is perhaps the mostly likely to vote for 50bps, given her belief that a faster tightening may mean less tightening overall. On the other side, there is a chance that dove Jon Cunliffe, and perhaps Silvana Tenreyro, vote for no change.
The difficulty is that even the hawks are starting to worry about the pressures on the UK consumer. Over-heated domestic demand (what monetary policy is designed to deal with) is not the issue right now, and the squeezing of real incomes and the tight fiscal environment will ensure that this remains the case going forward.
The BoE has previously guided that a 1% bank rate is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for the beginning of active gilt sales. The elevated financial market uncertainty that the Russian invasion of Ukraine has brought has necessitated further guidance emphasising this fact. Thursday’s meeting is instead likely to see additional details on how active sales might play out in the future. With the market expecting little in the near term, the risks on this front are tilted towards a more hawkish path for QT than is currently priced in.
There are several reasons for this belief:
In short, the BoE will prioritise UK consumers over market participants in its path for tightening. This suggests that, despite near-term market worries, the BoE should be gearing up to lean more heavily on QT than on the bank rate.
Back in February we stressed the fact that the MPR showed CPI undershooting its target of 2% towards the end of its forecast horizon (as per Chart 1). At the time this was a sign that market pricing for bank rate (on which the forecasts are conditional) had gone too far. Since then, an additional 50bps have been priced into the bank rate for December 2022.
It is likely, therefore, that even with more persistent inflation pressures through 2022, the end-of-horizon forecast will show an even greater undershoot of inflation in the updated MPR forecasts. We would take this as further indication that the BoE will push back against the market’s pricing of bank rate.
The risk, as we saw in March, is that the market will continue to ignore the more dovish messaging. Amid the likelihood of headline-grabbing increases in near-term inflation forecasts, and the possibility of hawkish dissent in the vote, the risk is that market continues to do so.
The case, nevertheless, remains strong for bear steepening in the gilts curve (Chart 4). We continue to see an efficient way of playing this as being via 2s30s steepeners, which should benefit from the eventual temperance of hike pricing, the year’s net-supply picture, and the structural change in long end demand from pension funds.
Spring sale - Prime Membership only £3 for 3 months! Get trade ideas and macro insights now
Your subscription has been successfully canceled.
Discount Applied - Your subscription has now updated with Coupon and from next payment Discount will be applied.