Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
I am changing my Fed call to a 50bp cut this week, 100bp in 2024 and 150bp in 2025, from previously 25bp, 75bp and 100bp respectively.
A key reason is that market pricing of 50bp has increased following the WSJ’s Timiraos stating that 50bp was a close call. If the Fed cuts less, they will likely get a negative market reaction. That is not what they are looking for at this stage.
In addition, the FT’s Smith had a Sunday follow-up piece to his Friday article that suggested political risks were a key factor for the Fed decision. By contrast, the follow-up piece argues that political risks are manageable. Political risks were a key reason for my earlier 25bp call.
Market pricing implies that the Fed is more worried by the economic outlook than I thought, and that is why I am also changing my calls for 2024-25.