![featured](https://macrohive.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/FOMC.jpg)
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
The Fed has already implied it would be on hold at its meeting next week. Therefore, the main takeaway will be the guidance. I expect the Fed to keep its easing bias but convey a shallower easing cycle.
Recent Fed communications have turned more hawkish. The minutes of the 1 May FOMC, released 22 May, said:
‘Although monetary policy was seen as restrictive, many participants commented on their uncertainty about the degree of restrictiveness. These participants saw this uncertainty as coming from the possibility that high interest rates may be having smaller effects than in the past, that longer-run equilibrium interest rates may be higher than previously thought, or that the level of potential output may be lower than estimated.’
In addition, the minutes said, ‘Various participants mentioned a willingness to tighten policy further should risks to inflation materialize in a way that such an action became appropriate.’
This was a marked change of tone relative to previous Fedspeak and the 1 May meeting itself. It also came despite a softer April CPI on 15 May. I cannot link the change to a specific data release or event. Rather, it is likely to reflect inflation trends, continued growth dynamism and rising political risks (Charts 1 and 2).
Despite his guilty verdict, former President Trump continues to lead President Biden in the polls and in betting markets. A second Trump administration would raise inflation risks. To preserve policy optionality, the Fed could have decided to move nearer a neutral bias ahead of the 5 November elections.
I expect Chair Powell to communicate that the policy outlook is unchanged but that the Fed needs more ‘good’ inflation prints before it can start cutting. I also expect him to convey strong confidence in the growth outlook. The SEP is therefore likely to show fewer and later cuts than the March SEP.
I expect the SEP core PCE, growth and unemployment forecasts to be roughly unchanged. Unchanged core PCE would reflect current inflation stickiness and that the Fed is confident it can keep inflation on the path envisaged in the March SEP.
Growth could be marked down in 2024 to reflect the downside surprise in Q1, but I expect the longer-term growth trajectory to be little changed.
Unchanged unemployment would reflect that the Fed still believes it can stabilize inflation without raising unemployment.
Because of current inflation stickiness, I expect the dot plot to show fewer cuts:
I still expect no cut in 2024, based on my forecast that core PCE will remain stuck around 3%, against markets pricing two cuts by December. I also expect the presser to surprise on the hawkish side.
.
.
Spring sale - Prime Membership only £3 for 3 months! Get trade ideas and macro insights now
Your subscription has been successfully canceled.
Discount Applied - Your subscription has now updated with Coupon and from next payment Discount will be applied.