data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f188/3f1886fe45135a25fe7b3274acfae01289db8579" alt="featured"
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
At December’s FOMC presser, Fed Chair Jerome Powell made a surprise dovish pivot, stating for the first time that the FOMC had discussed rate cuts and taking a sanguine view of the inflation outlook.
The minutes were broadly in line with Powell’s presser. The meeting participants viewed the FFR at or near peak and most expected 2024 cuts. They noted, ‘the decline in inflation seen during 2023, the recent shift down in six-month inflation readings in particular, and the growing signs of demand and supply coming into better balance in product and labor markets.’ The minutes also included the customary caveats about uncertainty and that the Fed would not hesitate to hike again if disinflation stopped.
Since December’s FOMC, growth and inflation have been below or in line with FOMC expectations. The Atlanta Fed Q4 GDP nowcast is 2.4% SAAR, below the SEP projections of 2.6%. Unemployment remains at 3.7%, below the SEP’s 3.8%. Also, the broader labour market indicators the Fed monitors show continued rebalancing (Chart 1). November core PCE has fallen to 3.2% and the December consensus forecast implies Q4/Q4 at 3.2%, in line with the SEP.
Post-December FOMC, six-month core PCE is still falling: it was 1.9% SAAR in November, and the consensus forecast for December implies that it will fall further to 1.8%. This increases the risk that the US could return to the pre-pandemic ‘lowflation’ (i.e., the persistent underperformance of inflation relative to the Fed’s target.
In line with Powell’s December presser, FOMC members’ public comments have shifted from ‘it is premature to think about cuts’ to discussing timing of the cuts. They have generally stuck to generic statements, such as ‘the Fed will cut when it is confident inflation is moving back to 2% sustainably’ (Williams, dove, voting), ‘it would be scary to ease too quickly’ (Daly, dove, voting), the Fed should cut ‘methodically and carefully’ (Waller, voter, hawkish), and ‘I don’t want to prejudge the March meeting’ (Barkin, voter, hawk).
The exceptions are Mester (hawk, voting), for whom ‘March is too early’, and Bostic (dove, voting), who is ‘expecting a cut in Q3 from previously Q4’.
In addition, FOMC members are generally attempting to push back against market expectations of multiple cuts, likely responding to easing financial conditions following December’s FOMC (Chart 2). For instance, Logan sees disinflation at risk from easier financial conditions and Goolsbee believes ‘the market may have put the cart before the horse on cuts.’ The exception is Waller, stating that ‘on net, financial conditions remain restrictive and continue to have the desired effect of being a drag on economic activity to put downward pressure on inflation.’
Lastly, FOMC speakers generally see policy in a ‘good place’. However, Waller sees rising risks of overly tight policy, ‘From now on, the setting of policy needs to proceed with more caution to avoid over-tightening.’
I expect the Fed to cut in March due to:
I therefore expect this FOMC meeting to prepare markets for a March cut. Specifically, I expect the following changes to the statement:
These changes would be consistent with the 2019 Fed game plan: references to hikes were removed in the January 2019 statement, and indications of greater downside risks to the economy were added in the June statement, leading to the July cut. The key differences this time are that inflation is falling much faster than in 2019 and that Fed cuts would be an insurance against lowflation rather than recession.
During the presser, I expect Powell to stick to the messages of the December presser, namely:
I also expect him to go through all the customary caveats. First and foremost, that Fed decisions will be data driven and taken ‘meeting by meeting based on the totality of the incoming data.’ While I believe that, as explained by Waller, benign February revisions to the CPI are a necessary condition for a March cut, I do not expect Powell to be that specific.
In addition, Powell is likely to warn that the Fed will not hesitate to hike again if disinflation stops, that it will proceed ‘methodically and carefully’, and that it will not cut too quickly, etc.
Since end-December, markets have lowered their expectations of a 25bp March cut from 90% to about one-third. This likely reflects the strong demand prints together with viewing the cuts as a hedge against recession.
I think Fed cuts would be a hedge against lowflation and I therefore do not see the recent strong demand prints as lowering the risks.
My probabilities for the March meeting remain 50% for a 50bp cut, 45% for a 25bp cut, and 5% for no cut, which is mainly based on the next two core PCE prints lowering six-month core PCE further away from the Fed’s 2% target.
This view can be expressed through a SOFR call spread with 6.5x upside if the Fed cuts 50bp in March.
Spring sale - Prime Membership only £3 for 3 months! Get trade ideas and macro insights now
Your subscription has been successfully canceled.
Discount Applied - Your subscription has now updated with Coupon and from next payment Discount will be applied.