Monetary Policy & Inflation | US
Since the 3 May FOMC meeting, strong growth and inflation data together with FOMC comments have shown that an extended pause is not a done deal. FOMC members generally see no decisive evidence that inflation trends are reverting to the 2% target.
This article is only available to Macro Hive subscribers. Sign-up to receive world-class macro analysis with a daily curated newsletter, podcast, original content from award-winning researchers, cross market strategy, equity insights, trade ideas, crypto flow frameworks, academic paper summaries, explanation and analysis of market-moving events, community investor chat room, and more.
Summary of Key Issues
Since the 3 May FOMC meeting, strong growth and inflation data together with FOMC comments have shown that an extended pause is not a done deal. FOMC members generally see no decisive evidence that inflation trends are reverting to the 2% target.
At the same time, the tightening of credit conditions is in line with previous Fed tightening cycles, while credit demand is weakening. As a result, FOMC members lack clarity on the macroeconomic impact of the banking crisis.
The debt ceiling standoff is adding to this conundrum. It seems more likely than not that the US will pass the x-date without an agreement. If so, the Fed is likely to be entirely focused on ensuring that Treasury markets continue to function. This includes implementing the interest and other payments prioritization the administration is likely to adopt.
In the absence of a debt ceiling crisis, I would expect the Fed to hike in June and pause in July. With a debt crisis, I expect the Fed to pause until the crisis is resolved, and hike thereafter. There is also a good chance that the June SEP could show a higher 2023 FFR. This is based on my assumption that a debt crisis would get resolved fast enough to have no lasting impact on markets and economy.