Claim your one month free trial for access to our premium content.

By Bilal Hafeez 09-08-2019
In: post | US

Washington Should Tax Capital Inflows (Carnegie Endowment, 4 min read)

Resize text:

(You can read the article by clicking here)

Last month, a bill was submitted to the US Senate: the ‘Competitive Dollar for Jobs & Prosperity Act’. It aims to maintain a current account balancing price for the dollar within five years. In this article, Michael Pettis, Professor of Finance at Peking University’s Guanghua School of Management, argues that taxing capital inflows might be the only effective way to tackle trade imbalances other than imposing tariffs. However, Pettis highlights that the big risk with taxing capital inflows comes when there are capital shortages in the US. Overall Pettis considers that the recently proposed bill is a step in the right direction to address trade imbalances.

Why does this matter? The US has a persistent trade deficit and lawmakers have always sought to address this by way of trade tariffs, which are considered a far inferior tool than taxing the capital inflows.

(The commentary contained in the above article does not constitute an offer or a solicitation, or a recommendation to implement or liquidate an investment or to carry out any other transaction. It should not be used as a basis for any investment decision or other decision. Any investment decision should be based on appropriate professional advice specific to your needs.)